Cool nice work Ron! Maybe a new subject for what this is really about  ...

-- 
 J. Hellenthal

The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a 
lot about anticipated traffic volume.

> On Jan 24, 2021, at 13:36, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> Again, I'm not saying is the best way, is what the community *decided* 
> before I added a clarification. The 50% was not a change, just to make it 
> explicit, what was the actual interpretation.
> 
> If you don't like it, stop complaining, and send a policy proposal, I could 
> even support it, but I'm not convinced it will reach consensus.
> 
> 
> 
> El 24/1/21 15:34, "NANOG en nombre de Masataka Ohta" 
> <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@nanog.org en nombre de 
> mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> escribió:
> 
>    JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
> 
>> I fully understand what you mean, however, I don’t think this is a
>> problem even if all the RIRs ask for “%50 or even 100%” of usage in
>> the region.
> 
>    So, you don't know how most, if not all, ISPs are operating
>    their network.
> 
>> That will make your life more complex, as you will need to obtain
> 
>    It makes ISP's operations a lot more complex and a lot less
>    profitable to be ignored by almost all, if not all, ISPs.
> 
>    Your theory that ISPs could have behaved otherwise is not
>    helpful in the real world of business and not practically
>    acceptable by RIRs mostly consisting of ISPs.
> 
>                            Masataka Ohta
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
> individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
> prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to