Tom,

I think it’s fair to defend good and decent ideas on NANOG.

In my opinion, it’s a good and decent idea that we spend a tiny amount of 
bandwidth acknowledging Internet pioneers and helping them as they encounter 
unexpected adversity. Jim’s posting of Ed Hew’s GoFundMe is just such a good 
and decent idea. I think Jim for it.

Not all of us are blessed with well-paying jobs and benefits at Fortune 500 
companies. And health crises can strike any of us.

There, but for the grace of God, go we all.

  -mel

On Jan 25, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Tom Beecher 
<beec...@beecher.cc<mailto:beec...@beecher.cc>> wrote:

Guys, let's maybe turn the temperature down a bit.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 1:04 PM Mel Beckman 
<m...@beckman.org<mailto:m...@beckman.org>> wrote:
Bill,

So, we can only mention in this forum the actual death of Internet pioneers, 
such as Mark Crispin, Jon Postel, and Jeanette Symons?

What if the person’s health is tied to a major infrastructure component, such 
as http://www.registry.ca?<http://www.registry.ca/?> No? Not a valid 
“operational” case?

Your position seems to be "let us nip this in sad news the bud, before it 
spreads". Because, I guess, there are literally millions of selfless Internet 
pioneers, and we don’t want NANOG to be flooded with their memories, or at 
least their pleas for modest assistance as a token of appreciation for their 
lifetime of contribution.

“NANOG owes them nothing!”, you didn’t say, but I heard.

 -mel

On Jan 25, 2021, at 9:23 AM, William Herrin 
<b...@herrin.us<mailto:b...@herrin.us>> wrote:

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:40 AM Jim Mercer 
<j...@reptiles.org<mailto:j...@reptiles.org>> wrote:
unsure if this is allowed or not, but, here goes.

Hi Jim,

This is a lie. If you weren't sure, you'd have asked if it was ok to
do the thing without actually doing the thing. That you went ahead and
did it says you were pretty sure it was against the rules and figured
you could get away with it. You may be right but the lie compounds the
offense.

I'm sorry to hear about Ed. Nevertheless, a lot of us are getting on
in age and health and the Internet doesn't need another mailing list
about how sad it is to grow old.

May I suggest: spend a line in your signature block on the off-topic
things you want folks on this group to know. And then attach it only
to messages which are on topic.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


Reply via email to