On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:11 AM Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> wrote: > Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> writes: > > > The 3 cellular networks in the usa, 100m subs each, use ipv6 to uniquely > > address customers. And in the case of ims (telephony on a celluar), it is > > ipv6-only, afaik. > > I certainly agree that this is easier and makes more sense. I just > don't buy the "can't be done" wrt using rfc1918. >
Well, it is not rfc1918 that is best invoked here. May i point you to rfc1925 section 2.3, regarding pigs flying with sufficient thrust. IPv4 is the pig, and a steam engined fueled by dollars is the source of thrust https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1925 > > Bjørn >
