On 05/03/2021 01:14, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
First, take a look at this:
https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894 <https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/18894>
Now look at these (or use your own BGP table analysis tools):
https://bgp.he.net/AS18894 <https://bgp.he.net/AS18894>
https://stat.ripe.net/18894 <https://stat.ripe.net/18894>
The claimed prefixes announced, traffic levels and POPs appear to have
no correlation with reality in global v4/v6 BGP tables.
It is also noteworthy that I have inquired with a number of persons I
know who are active in network engineering in NYC, and nobody has ever
encountered this company.
Hi Nanog!
If you stumble across such things, drop us a note at
supp...@peeringdb.com and we will take a look at it.
-Stefan
