Of course, sftp and other ssh-based protocols are *still* hamstrung to a maximum of 32k data outstanding due to hardcoded SSH channel window sizes by default for most people, unless you're patching up both your clients and servers.
Sadly, this blows ssh out of the water for anything with even modest high-bitrate requirements over moderate-BDP links. - S -----Original Message----- From: Jo Rhett <jrh...@netconsonance.com> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 23:27 To: Joe Greco <jgr...@ns.sol.net> Cc: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com>; nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Joe Greco wrote: > While HTTP remains popular as a way to interact with humans, > especially if > you want to try to do redirects, acknowledge license agreements, > etc., FTP > is the file transfer protocol of choice for basic file transfer Speak for yourself. I haven't used FTP to transfer files in 10 years now. About 7 years ago I turned off FTP support for all of our webhosting clients, and forced them to use SFTP. 3 left, for a net loss of $45/month. And we stopped having to deal with the massive undertaking that supporting FTP properly chrooted and capable of dealing with all parts of the multi-mount web platform required. We've never looked back. Ever once in a while I find someone who's offering a file I want only via FTP, and I chide them and they fix it ;-) -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
