Two questions... 1. How many on this list already have dual-stack or IPv6 only in operation?
2. If you are running IPv4 only, and a major service was to switch to IPv6 only,.. a. How fast would you move to a dual-stack of IPv6 only? b. What would it impact your customers? c. How would it impact your business? Joe Klein "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1) "*I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been." -- *Wayne Gretzky "I never lose. I either win or learn" - Nelson Mandela On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:56 PM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 6:13 AM Izaac <iz...@setec.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:38:00AM -0800, William Herrin wrote: > > > None whatsoever. You just have to be really big. > > > > Hi Beel, > > That was unnecessary. Sorry I used an S instead of a Z. > > > Thanks for backing me up with an example of an organization with > > competent network engineering. Their ability to almost infinitely > > leverage the existing rfc1918 address space to serve an appreciable > > fraction of all Internet attached hosts is a real demonstration of the > > possible. > > Except they don't. One of the reasons you can't put vms in multiple > regions into the same VPC is they don't have enough IP addresses to > uniquely address the backend hosts in every region. They end up with a > squirrelly VPC peering thing they relies on multiple gateway hosts to > overcome the address partitioning from overlapping RFC1918. > > In other words, it proves the exact opposite of your assertion. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > > -- > William Herrin > b...@herrin.us > https://bill.herrin.us/ >