> > Based on how difficult it is to correct their data for them at no charge, > I'm not sure he's entirely wrong in that statement. >
No, it's still wrong. Stating that Google's team 'doesn't want to improve things' , while also having zero knowledge of the reasons why the current issues are present, is at best uninformed , and at worst just plain ignorant. On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 2:29 PM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Based on how difficult it is to correct their data for them at no charge, > I'm not sure he's entirely wrong in that statement. > > The fact that this thread exists, the latest of multiple, and has ended in > no resolution to the problem once again is a testament to how Google > responds to this problem. > > Josh Luthman > 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:23 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > wrote: > >> On 3/11/21 2:36 AM, William Guo wrote: >> > but they don't wanna improve it for some reason. >> >> That is both unfair and wrong. >> >> I know for a fact that they do want their internal GeoIP to be as >> accurate as possible and that they do want to improve the inaccuracies >> if and when possible. >> >> I have personally submitted a handful of GeoIP changes through channels. >> It does take a wile O(weeks) to complete. But it /does/ complete. >> >> If you have a GGC node, you can reach out to the GGC operations team for >> help resolving GeoIP issues. Ostensibly the GGC operations team focuses >> on GGC related issues. But they should be able to document the issue >> and send it to proper internal teams anyway. >> >> I would assume that Google's NOC can also re-route issues as necessary. >> >> I believe that saying "they don't wanna improve" as a fact, vs an >> opinion, is disingenuous and somewhat rude. >> >> >> >> -- >> Grant. . . . >> unix || die >> >>