On 4/14/21 18:03, Stan Barber wrote:

I would suggest that the regulation paradigm in Texas does not allow coordinated maintenance scheduling to adapt to supply and load issues (especially in the face of a disaster like the Winter event earlier this year). That would mean a stronger regulatory framework and that smacks of government interference in the eyes of some.

45 days of planned notice, is what I read. And can be rejected if that notification window is shorter than that.

Is that sufficient?

Mark.

Reply via email to