I prefer the approach of disaggregating only when needed, not as a preventative measure. There are tools that can help with automating this disaggregation (ARTEMIS can do this, for example).
— Chris On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:50 AM Billy Croan <bcr...@unrealservers.net> wrote: > How does the community feel about using /24 originations in BGP as a > tactical advantage against potential bgp hijackers? > > All of our allocations are larger and those prefixes we announce for > clients as well usually are. But we had a request recently to > originate everything as distinct /24 prefixes, to reduce the effect of > a potential bgp hijack. It seemed a little bit like a tragedy of the > commons situation. > > Is this seen as route table pollution, or a necessary evil in today's > world? > How many routers out there today would be affected if everyone did this? > Are there any big networks that drop or penalize announcements like this? >