On 8/27/21 4:30 PM, John Curran wrote:> > ARIN does not normally comment on disputes or related litigation occurring > at another RIR, but this matter has become quite different, as it is both > highly public and has potential for significant impact to the overall > stability of the Internet number registry system and thus to ARIN and its > community.
Perhaps what's needed is for parties to be able to move their allocations to a different RIR if they don't like the service their incumbent RIR is providing. >> I’d expect that for a court to freeze assets of AFRINIC there must be a >> very strong argument. > > Indeterminate at this time, since a “Freezing Order" issued via ex party > hearing doesn’t actually test the strength of the arguments, as the > affected party is not present to respond. It is only when the case for the > validation of the order is heard that the strength of the arguments could > possibly be assessed. Note - the full list of cases filed are here > <https://afrinic.net/court-cases <https://afrinic.net/court-cases>> for > reference. That's interesting, but that normally one would expect the bar for such and ex-parte order to be high. I'm not familiar with the Mauritius legal system; I do know it's some combination of common law and french law, but it's generally stable/impartial for business law. What we really need is a groklaw-type that could take this up. -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature