You're confusing things.
The fact that cellular providers, actually cellular equipment vendors, do not
implement DHCPv6-PD, doesn't mean that you can't use DHCPv6-PD for assigning
IPv6 prefixes using 464XLAT in broadband.
See RFC8585 and RFC8683.
El 6/9/21 14:56, "NANOG en nombre de Bjørn Mork"
<nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@nanog.org en nombre de bj...@mork.no>
escribió:
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> writes:
> All this is resolved using IPv6-only and IPv4aaS, the same way as
> cellular providers are doing with 464XLAT.
Sure, there are a gazillion ways to provde edge access to both IPv4 and
IPv6. You can pick anyone you like. But the extra layers still do not
come for free.
And cellular providers give you a single /64. Not even useful as IPv6
access for anything larger than a single handset. Extending that /64 to
something you can use is non-trivial. How many providers have actually
done that?
And how many end users cared?
Bjørn
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
