> On Sep 16, 2021, at 06:35 , Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sep 16, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This has nothing to do with IPv6, of course, other than that modern phones
>> use
>> VoLTE so within a mobile carrier's network your voice call is probably
>> handled
>> using IPv6 transport.
>>
>> Good point John.
>>
>> A lot of folks missed that ipv6 absorbed the scale growth in mobile, and
>> mobile is what most eyeballs and be big content consider the internet to be.
>> And, yes, mobile voice is called VoLTE and is most commonly deployed in the
>> usa with ipv6.
>>
>> And most internet is called youtube / fb, and that is ipv6 too.
>>
>> This is where i live and work , 87% of mobiles on v6, voice and data
>>
>> https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/CombinedUSMobileCarriers.png
>>
>> This is where nanog seems to be (old man yells at cloud meme)
>>
>> https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/memepediadankmemes/images/0/01/297.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20180908193511
>>
>> I don’t see the failure of ipv6 in 2021. It is globally deployed, providing
>> global address, to billions of things and PB/s of content
>>
>> There are laggards in adopting v6, but they have not stopped the frontier of
>> internet to reaching billions of people and things.
>>
>
>
> Yeah, I think this is the thing that I see people most often missing. Yes
> your provider may not be doing IPv6, but many applications and providers may
> yet be IPv6 internally or IPv6 to the popular content.
>
> I also say the number of people who store an IP as integer in a
> mysql(mariadb) backend is not to be underestimated.
Nothing wrong with this as long as it’s a 128 bit integer. ;-)
> I still see some people doing the split up the IPv6 to store it in multiple
> columns thing even in 2021 which is disappointing as it shows this
> backwards/legacy thinking.
UGH… I haven’t seen that in a while, sad to hear it’s still going on.
Owen
