On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:21:26 -0400 Rich Kulawiec <r...@gsp.org> wrote: > (a) This discussion should probably be happening someplace other > than NANOG (spam-l or mailop, perhaps?), and
True. I didn't bring it up but this is my last post on the subject. > (b) If you feel that UCEProtect L3 paints with too broad a brush, > then you're certainly free not to use it. I happen to agree with you > on this particular level of this particular DNSBL for my particular > applications, so I don't use it either. However: I'm aware of other > folks who are using it quite effectively as *part* of a scoring system. I don't use it but my problem was that other ISPs whose clients were trying to email my clients were using it. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <da...@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
