On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 5:03 PM Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: > > On 2021-12-04, at 16:18, Cynthia Revström via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > > > I think pretty much all codes ending in an X is because there were no > > better ones available. (I am not certain on this part though) > > I don’t think the Mexicans would agree :-)
Oh oops, not sure how I forgot about that one, I just thought about ax, cx, and sx. > .bx (Benelux) is reserved only, but it is another counter-example. I am really nitpicking here but I believe BX is one of the cases of not being a ccTLD but just ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code for some other reason (seemingly for trademark/IP reasons in this case). -Cynthia
