On 2 Apr 2022, at 6:23 PM, Jeroen Massar via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > There are a lot of bits and bobs that one has to get right for mail to flow, > amongst which: > > - IP -> PTR lookup -> that hostname lookup, and match to IP again > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-confirmed_reverse_DNS) > - SPF > - DKIM > - DMARC > - ARC (for mailinglists) > - SRS (When forwarding, rewrite the From and resign DKIM, and then ARC-sign > that) > - Decent TLS > - MTA-STS
Jeroen - It is indeed amazing how many protocols we can spin up to address the same underlying problem, time and time again... If anyone can anonymously join the mail-sending club and send some email [until bad reputation precludes such], and achieving bad reputation results has no real-world implications, and a new network persona (e.g. domain name) is always available, then the problem could be considered intractable by initial conditions – and no amount of anti-spam protocols (no matter how brilliantly designed and engineered) should be expected to durably address the problem. (It might, however, be interesting to do a regression analysis on the spam mitigation protocol introduction dates – it’d be interesting to know if the expected number protocols that will need proper setup in 10, 20, 40 years…!) <chuckle> /John Disclaimer(s): my views alone. This email composed of 100% recycled electrons.
