That is all obvious to me at least. I was just pointing out the folly in saying 
“what would one do with that much X” resource. We always have found a way
going back to the beginning. My story about back at BT was prior to video 
streaming. At that point in time it didn’t exist and was made a reality in 
part, because of the simple increase in bandwidth available to subscribers (and 
everywhere else).

—Tom


> On May 23, 2022, at 3:53 PM, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/23/22 12:29 PM, David Bass wrote:
>> What is changing in the next 5 years that could possibly require a household 
>> to need a gig?  That is just ridiculous. 
> I think the key thing is just to get fiber laid. Once that happens ISP's can 
> turn up the dial relatively easy as needed. Also: even if they gave you a 
> nominal rate of 1G it doesn't mean that they won't oversubcribe the headend 
> and beyond. 
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 3:15 PM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com 
>> <mailto:m...@mtcc.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> On 5/23/22 12:04 PM, Thomas Nadeau wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> On May 23, 2022, at 3:00 PM, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com 
>> >> <mailto:m...@mtcc.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 5/23/22 11:49 AM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
>> >>> The Fiber Broadband Association estimates that the average US household 
>> >>> will need more than a gig within 5 years.  Why not just jump it to a gig 
>> >>> or more?
>> >>
>> >> Really? What is the average household doing to use up a gig worth of 
>> >> bandwidth?
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> > Thats almost the same question we were asked at BT a dozen years ago when 
>> > moving from DSL -> FTTC when someone said, “but surely DSL is sufficient 
>> > because its so much faster than dial.”
>> 
>> The two of us survive just fine with 25Mbs even when we have a house 
>> full of friends. I mean it would be nice to have 100Mbs so that it's 
>> never a problem but the reality is that it just hasn't been a problem in 
>> practice. I mean how many 4k streams are running at the same time in the 
>> average household? What else besides game downloads are sucking up that 
>> much bandwidth all of the time?
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> > —Tom
>> >
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> On 5/23/2022 1:40 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>> >>>> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-broadband-providers-0
>> >>>>  
>> >>>> <https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-broadband-providers-0>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The Federal Communications Commission voted [May 19, 2022] to seek 
>> >>>> comment on a proposal to provide additional universal service support 
>> >>>> to certain rural carriers in exchange for increasing deployment to more 
>> >>>> locations at higher speeds. The proposal would make changes to the 
>> >>>> Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) program, with the goal 
>> >>>> of achieving widespread deployment of faster 100/20 Mbps broadband 
>> >>>> service throughout the rural areas served by rural carriers currently 
>> >>>> receiving A-CAM support.
>> >>>>

Reply via email to