> On Jun 2, 2022, at 06:41 , Masataka Ohta <mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> > wrote: > > Sean Donelan wrote: > >>> USF is great for rural, but it has turned medium density and suburban areas >>> into connectivity wastelands. >> Carrier & cable lobbying organizations say that free market competition by >> multiple providers provide adequate service in those areas. > > That's simply untrue, because of natural regional monopoly. Lobbyists lie? Say it isn’t so. You seem somehow surprised by this. Most of us have grown quite accustomed to it. Owen
- Re: FCC proposes higher s... Josh Luthman
- Re: FCC proposes higher s... Joly MacFie
- Re: FCC proposes higher s... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (1... Mike Hammett
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/2... Jeff Shultz
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (1... t...@pelican.org
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goal... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed ... Sean Donelan
- Re: FCC proposes higher s... Masataka Ohta
- Re: FCC proposes higher s... Dorn Hetzel
- Re: FCC proposes higher s... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher s... Masataka Ohta
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (1... Eric Kuhnke
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goal... Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed ... John Levine
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goal... Livingood, Jason via NANOG
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed ... Jared Mauch
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (1... Kauto Huopio
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbp... Owen DeLong via NANOG