Seeing the little of that thread.
I never understood why someone thinks their experience with Level 1
thru 3 staff reflect the actual situation.
That was clearly an issue with network engineering and their
processes. Because a 14h downtime for, as Rogers says, "a specific
equipment" is too big of a spin.
-----
Alain hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
On 7/9/22 21:18, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
We should move on and focus on constructive comments vs. kicking an
operator when they are down.
That said, demeaning comments, no matter what they are or whom they
are targeted at, is not healthy and is not helpful.
regards,
Victor K
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 9:11 PM L F <liz.faze...@gmail.com> wrote:
Lest we ALL MOVE ON….
Yes he said
“RETARD” =
The delay in processing the current status of a Situation…
Lets move on to bigger n scarier Post mortems:
Was This or Was this NOT
A CYBERATTACK ???
Done.
Lets deal with REAL threats not PC references.
Time to evaluate n re eval Our NTS!!
Veni vidi vici 2022
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 5:01 PM Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Can we have a discussion with the list admins about a list
member appending a threat of violence to their outbound
emails? Whether serious or not.
Does this person need directions to some local mental
healthcare resources?
On Sat, 9 Jul 2022 at 08:48, Keith Medcalf
<kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote:
>I can't either, but the reality right now seems to be
that 911 calls are
>failing for anyone on a Rogers cellphone.
This is par for the course. These people chose to deal
with Rogers despite knowing the consequences. It is like
if you bought a Rogers Snowblower and it did not work.
That would mean that people who bought the Rogers
Snowblower will not be using it to get rid of the snow
that is preventing them from leaving their house.
Mutatis mutandis when Rogers is down things that are
Rogers dependent will not work.
Some people are so retarded it is astonishing!
--
(CAUTION) You are advised that if you attack my person or
property, you will be put down in accordance with the
provisions of section 34 & 35 of the Criminal Code
respectively. If you are brandishing (or in possession)
of a weapon then lethal force will be applied to your
person in accordance with the law. This means that your
misadventures may end in your death. Consider yourself
cautioned and govern your actions appropriately.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+kmedcalf=dessus....@nanog.org>
On Behalf Of
>Eric Kuhnke
>Sent: Friday, 8 July, 2022 13:34
>To: jim deleskie <deles...@gmail.com>
>Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
>Subject: Re: Rogers Outage Canada
>
>
>I have seen anecdotal reports that the mobile network is
in a half broken
>state that phones remain registered to, so a 911 call
will attempt and
>then fail.
>
>
>This is unlike what would happen if you had a US/Canada
cellphone with
>battery power but no SIM card in it that would search for
any available
>network in RF range for a 911 call if needed.
>
>
>On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 12:31, jim deleskie <deles...@gmail.com
><mailto:deles...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>
>
> i cant see BGP taking out SS7.
>
> -jim
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:45 PM Snowmobile2004
><greenjosh6...@gmail.com <mailto:greenjosh6...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> According to Cloudflare Radar
><https://radar.cloudflare.com/asn/812?date_filter=last_24_hours>
, Rogers
>BGP announcements spiked massively to levels 536,777%
higher than normal
>(343,601 vs 64 normally) just minutes before the outage.
I would not be
>surprised if this happened to be the culprit.
>
> Regards,
> Josh Green
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:19 PM Andrew
Paolucci via NANOG
><nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org> > wrote:
>
>
> In the early hours of the morning
around 2-3am my modem
>got hit with a configuration update that caused a DHCP
release that
>wasn't renewed for about two hours, after rollback the
connection was
>fine for 3 hours before this network wide outage.
>
>
> Maybe a failed night time update
was attempted again
>during office hours, I've heard daytime guys are still
WFH and night
>shift is in building.
>
>
> I expect we'll never get a real
explanation. Rogers is
>notorious for withholding any type of helpful or
technical information.
>
>
> Sent from my inoperable Rogers
Mobile via emergency eSIM.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrew Paolucci
> -------- Original Message --------
> On Jul. 8, 2022, 1:48 p.m., Jay
Hennigan < j...@west.net
><mailto:j...@west.net> > wrote:
>
>
> On 7/8/22 07:44, Robert
DeVita wrote: > Does anyone
>have information on a widespread Rogers outage in Canada.
I > have
>customers with multiple sites down. There's discussion on
the Outages
>mailing list. Seems widespread, affecting all services,
mobile, voice,
>Internet. No cause or ETR posted yet. -- Jay Hennigan -
j...@west.net
><mailto:j...@west.net> Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 -
>WB6RDV
>
>
>
> --
>
> Josh Green.
--
Liz *******
416.660.5456
