Hello Saku I do not share that view:
1) Thread uses 6LoWPAN so nodes are effectively IPv6 even though it doesn’t show in the air. 2) Wi-Sun is not Thread and it is already deployed by millions. 3) even LoRa (1.1.1) is going IPv6, using SCHC. Regards, Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> > Sent: mercredi 10 août 2022 7:14 > To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com> > Cc: Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org>; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: IoT - The end of the internet > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 07:54, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG > <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > > On a more positive note, the IPv6 IoT can be seen as an experiment on > how we can scale the internet another order of magnitude or 2 without > taking the power or the spectrum consumption to the parallel levels. > > I think at least the next 20 years of IoT is thread (and wifi for high > BW)+matter, and IoT devices won't have IP that is addressable even from > the user LAN, you go via GW, none of which you configure. > > Some bits of if look unnecessarily forced perspective, like the > addressing scheme, instead of inlining your role in PDU we use this > cutesy addressing scheme looks like bit forced marketing of IPv6, > doesn't seem necessary but also not really an important decision either > way. Overall I think thread+matter are well designed and they make me > quite optimistic of reasonable IoT outcomes. > > -- > ++ytti
