ROA isn't mandatory. If it was, it would be a better comparison. Still, showing that low adoption rate shows the industry's interest in it.
I think we all see the problem, but is there a viable solution? Is the problem big enough to warrant the transition? On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 2:29 PM Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > Does another barrier to entry make sense? > > ROV's ROA creation is a barrier to entry in north america, as discussed > in another thread or see > > https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2035/ > > there are other cultures where isp operational security is taken more > seriously than power and money. > > > Do we trust the FCC to come up with an industry wide fool proof > > (whatever that means) security standard? > > note that the DHS funded the development of both dns and routing > security technology. otoh, as other cultures, clue is not evenly > distributed. > > the first step is said to be admitting one has a problem. > > randy >