On 27/05/2009, at 8:11 AM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On May 27, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using
it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled
garden mindset.
I concur quite strongly with your views on this particular topic,
but the CGN boat appears to've sailed, AFAICT.
Note that Tony is talking about 6-to-6 NAT, not 6-to-4 NAT or vice
versa (not to be confused with 6to4 tunnelling).
I'm not sure that boat has sailed yet.
--
Nathan Ward