On 11/20/22 19:02, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
Dear Mark:
0) I am surprised at your apparently sarcastic opinion.
1) The EzIP proposal as referenced by my last MSG is the result of an
in-depth system engineering effort. Since the resultant schemes do not
rely on any protocol development, IETF does not need be involved.
Especially, its first step of disabling one line of existing
networking program code empowers any party to begin deploying EzIP
stealthily for mitigating the IPv4 address pool depletion issues. Note
that EzIP is a generic solution applicable to everyone, not limited to
Africa.
2) Of course, constructive criticism is always appreciated. However,
unspecific comments that confuse and distract the readers only provide
dis-service to those disadvantaged population who are enduring the
handicaps of being the late-comers to the Internet.
My comment was not directed at you. Sorry.
I have nothing against the EzIP proposal. It just does not add any real
value in solving the IPv4 depletion problem for the amount of effort
required to implement it, in my view. I'd, rather, expend those
resources on IPv6, 464XLAT, e.t.c.
Mark.