Dear BZS:
1) " ... it was more likely due to the success of CGNAT.": Looking
forward from this milestone marker, what would you envision as the
possible additions to CG-NAT's characteristics and capabilities for the
potential expansion of its services and enhancement to its performances?
Thanks,
Abe (2023-01-16 10:22)
On 2023-01-11 19:33, b...@theworld.com wrote:
On January 12, 2023 at 02:11n...@neo.co.tz (Noah) wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> So, It was assumed that IPv4 depletion would effectively lead to the
adoption
> of IPv6. This has not been the case in the last decade save for a very few
> countries in the world.
>
> It was also assumed that IPv6 only networks would crop all over the place
as a
> result, providing the same interconnectivity benefits enjoyed by the IPv4
> internet.
>
> Out of curiosity,did the emergency of transfer markets slow IPNG adoption
while
> creating prolonged dependence on IPv4?
Probably ten people have said this already but it was more likely due
to the success of CGNAT.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
