The CUPS makes a lot of sense for this application. Latency is dependent on the design, and equipment used. I’ve seen/done several designs for this using two different vendors equipment and two different BNG software stacks.
When I do a design for BNG from scratch, this is how I do it now. :) As always… YMMV. - Brian > On Mar 22, 2023, at 4:02 PM, Tom Mitchell <tmitch...@netelastic.com> wrote: > > Anyone have any thoughts on this CUPS thing? I have a customer asking, but > it seems the lack of CP resiliency and additional latency between the DP and > CP make this a really dumb idea. Has anyone tried it? Does it make any > sense? > > Thanks!
