* ayc...@avinta.com (Abraham Y. Chen) [Fri 12 Jan 2024, 13:09 CET]:
EzIP proposes that 240/4 be used like 10.64/10 in CG-NAT. which is
reusable for each isolated geographical area. Thus, there is no
"Burn-rate" to talk about.
You have posted this statement like five times now in the past two days.
Who is asking for this expansion of 100.64/10 (which you misspelled,
by the way)? Where are the claims that the amount of private space
behind a CGNAT is the limiting factor in CGNAT deployments?
[five meters of superfluous quote history snipped]
-- Niels.
