That experiment already failed with the original v6 adoption process. It’s been more than 20 years and all we have proven is that as long as people can have an excuse to avoid v6 deployment, they will continue to do so.
Giving them another 20 years of excuses is a step against the collective good IMHO. Owen > On Feb 13, 2024, at 14:43, Christopher Hawker <ch...@thesysadmin.au> wrote: > > > Per my original email, looking at current exhaustion rates in the APNIC > service region, if we stuck to allocating space to new entities and > maintained allocating a maximum of a /22 to networks, just 3 x /8 would last > over 20 years. This should be a more than sufficient timeframe for a much > wider v6 adoption and deployment. > > Regards, > Christopher Hawker > From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+chris=thesysadmin...@nanog.org> on behalf of > Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) <lyn...@orthanc.ca> > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 7:42 AM > To: North American Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: The Reg does 240/4 > > And what are they going to do when 240/4 runs out?
