I'm jumping on an earlier part of the thread.
Based on what I heard at the Members Meeting and several follow up hallway
conversations, I think:
* NANOG needs a focus group on attendees. A survey won't do it, we need a
deep dive into roles, interests, career level, and why they attend.
* Somebody or somebodies should be specifically tasked with following up
with every one of the 120 newcomer attendees to ask what it would take to get
them to come back. Our conversion rate to repeat attendee is a key performance
indicator. There's a great Newcomer Orientation just before conference opening;
let's have a Newcomer Lessons Learned at the end.
* Poll attendees on relative importance of location, registration fee,
programming, side meeting space. Iterate based on comments (location = airport?
Hotel? Nearby amenities? Proximity to home?)
* Survey sponsors. I give feedback to staff and occasional board members,
but there's no clear way to gather information.
* These should be sent to the Members in advance of a Members Meeting to
discuss. Needs more than 20 minutes of a 45 minute meeting before main
programming.
* Consider empaneling a Mission Committee to review NANOG's mission and how
to fulfill it.
Other thoughts, which I couldn't submit in a survey or find another way to send
to the board or staff:
* I suggested in San Diego and now bring to the list: the last item on the
agenda should be 15-30 minutes of "What are you taking home from this NANOG?"
* Helps remind people what value they got
* Lets us know what people found most valuable (Specific sessions? deals
done? Trends in hallway topics?)
* Solidifies for people what they can offer their boss as the value of
sending them to NANOG
* We should look into cooperating with other network organizations for
meetings. WISPAmerica, NRECA, NTCA, Fiber Connect, SCTE, IETF
* ARIN has a help desk in the main hall. Allow other sponsors to put up a
Help Desk. Put up a sign showing which company will be there for which half-day
increment. I think a lot of attendees would find value in the ability to sit
down with a senior sales engineer at their favorite router, optical, or
intelligence vendor to say, "Here's my problem," even if many of those
conversations resulted in "Let's schedule time to discuss in more depth."
* Price it like BnG-you're getting ½ day of visibility, less distraction
than meal/break sponsors
* Require swag to be incidentals like pens and stickers-if you're
getting a mad rush of people, you're missing the point
This can't all be done in time for Kansas City, but maybe some of it can be.
Given that hotel contracts are negotiated two years in advance, I figure we
have about two years to get this right before it's too late to steer the ship
away from the rocks.
Let me close with: I think we have an excellent board, all of whom love this
community and have spent years thinking about this. The lack of a CEO is a
problem soon to be resolved, and that will help support the already excellent
staff. There are themes we've been hearing for several meetings in a row, and I
know the board is giving them a lot of thought, and I'm just trying to support
those efforts from outside the board.
Maybe this should have gone to the members mailing list, but I couldn't find
one.
Lee
From: NANOG <[email protected]> On Behalf
Of Warren Kumari
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 2:50 PM
To: Mike Hammett <[email protected]>
Cc: nanog <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?
You don't often get email from [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
This message is from an EXTERNAL SENDER - be CAUTIOUS, particularly with links
and attachments.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM, Mike Hammett
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I haven't been to a NANOG meeting in a while. While going through the attendee
list for NANOG 90 to try to book meetings with people, I noticed a lack of (or
extremely minimal) attendance by several organizations that have traditionally
had several employees attend. I've also noticed that some organizations I had
an interest in were only sending sales people, not technical people.
There have been a few changes - part of this is driven by post-pandemic
decreased travel budget in many organizations, part by industry changes and
consolidation, but also a fair bit seems to be because the tone of NANOG has
changed and become much more of a polished, sales-y feeling event than it used
to be....
Here is the current NANOG agenda:
https://www.nanog.org/events/nanog-90/agenda/
Here is the agenda from 20 years ago:
https://www.nanog.org/events/nanog-30/nanog-30-agenda-2/
This time I've received at least 6 phone calls along this line of "Hi, I'm
[person] from [company]. We are a NANOG sponsor and we'd like to personally
invite you to a very special [breakfast/lunch/dinner] with our [CEO/CTO].
They'd love to explain how we can solve your
[security/inventory/DDoS/automation/documentation] needs..."
There would alway be business stuff done at NANOG, but it used to be more along
the lines of "Hey, we have too much traffic in [location]. I saw you have a
cage in [location] too... If I hand you an Ethernet, can we peer there?
Great..." or "So, I have a Foozle-1205 with the Turbo-forwarding(R) option, but
when I configure hyperspace-bypass mode, fire comes out.... I know you also use
Turbo-forwarding(R), but it looks like you still have your eyebrows. Any hints?
Oh... cool, I didn't know that you could use wormholes to avoid the hyperspace
issue. Ta."
W
How long has this been a thing?
I remember when I attended years ago that there simply wasn't enough time to
meet with technical people from all of the organizations I wanted to meet with.
Now the calendar is looking a bit dry.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com<http://www.ics-il.com/>
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
