On 3/30/24 03:45, Ryan Hamel wrote:
Paul,
Anne's opinionĀ is just as valid as the others here. I have also
browsed through the recent attendee lists and do not see you listed
either, pot calling the kettle black. Your comments about her email
signature and which voices are valid here, are not productive. We are
allowed to back up and/or side with whomever we please, even if it
includes the NANOG board, staff, and committee members. We are also
allowed to call people out on their behavior towards others.
Agreed. Constructive dialogue makes no requirement for prior or final
agreement.
More talking is better than less talking, especially when we disagree.
Anyway, no one truly knows how many people could have raised the
scheduling issue with various committee members, the board, staff, or
provided feedback via the contact form on the website, and who knows
it could have come from young women. Those voices do not have to come
from the mailing list, to be just as valid as ours.
I'd imagine that data would, at the very least, be with the PC and other
members of NANOG staff; and in a manner that they can use to derive
reasonable solutions for the future.
Mark.