> > I'm surprised nobody noticed for close to 10 days.
Probably because it wasn't 10 days. On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:26 PM Scott Q. <qm...@top-consulting.net> wrote: > I'm surprised nobody noticed for close to 10 days. I was away from work > and upon coming back I saw the little discussion there was , in my Spam > folder. > > On Thursday, 16/05/2024 at 18:56 John R. Levine wrote: > > On Thu, 16 May 2024, William Herrin wrote: > > The message content (including the message headers) is theoretically > > not used for SPF validation. In practice, some SPF validators don't > > have direct access to the SMTP session so they rely on the SMTP > > session placing the envelope sender in the Return-path header. > > But that wasn't the problem here, the SPF record was just gone. Oops. > > I see that the SPF record is back and seems have the correct addresses so > we can now return to our previously scheduled flamage. > > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > >
