I don't think that URL explains how commonly it is used. In my experience TCP-AO use is extremely limited, partly because it's super new in practice. Juniper had it for a long time, but it was pre-standard even years after the standard was published, which probably didn't matter much, as no one else had it at all until somewhat recently.
I suspect this type of order of events may have led many people to look into TCP-AO early on, and decided correctly it was not operationally feasible, and that has stuck. On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 13:57, Marco Paesani <ma...@paesani.it> wrote: > > Hi, > you can start from here: > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/transport-ip/topics/topic-map/tcp-configure-ao-bgp-ldp.html > > Regards, > > > ----- > > Marco Paesani > > > > > Skype: mpaesani > Mobile: +39 348 6019349 > Success depends on the right choice ! > Email: ma...@paesani.it > > > > > Il giorno mer 12 giu 2024 alle ore 12:52 7ri...@gmail.com <7ri...@gmail.com> > ha scritto: >> >> Y'all -- >> >> Does anyone know of a survey or study showing the rate of uptake for BGP >> over TCP-AO? I've poked around some and asked in a few places and not found >> anything, but I probably missed something out there. >> >> If there's no studies, does anyone have any experiences possibly indicating >> BGP over TCP-AO usage they can share? >> >> :-) /r -- ++ytti
