On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Robert D. Scott<rob...@ufl.edu> wrote: > They will almost always prefer their IBGP to any learned routes. Why send > traffic to a transit network and skew their I/O peering numbers when you can > handle it yourself. I doubt you will change their mind.
http://onesc.net/communities/as1239/ uhm, prepend and/or localpref fiddling... -chris > Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu > Senior Network Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone > CNS - Network Services 352-392-2061 CNS Phone Tree > University of Florida 352-392-9440 FAX > Florida Lambda Rail 352-294-3571 FLR NOC > Gainesville, FL 32611 321-663-0421 Cell > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Brookhouse [mailto:eb...@setuidzero.org] > Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:36 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Sprint/Verizon BGP > > Hi all, > > > > Any Sprint BGP admins on this list can offer any thoughts on why Sprint > connected networks are preferring my Sprint connection when they should be > preferring my Verizon? > > > > I (Healthy Directions) am AS16387, two blocks 63.73.158.0/24 and > 63.78.31.0/24, being announced by sprint and Verizon, preferred to > Verizon(DS3) over Sprint 3MB. > > > > Verizon BGP admins think everything is ok, have not heard back from BGP4 at > sprint. > > > > Any thoughts appreciated, off-list contact welcome. > > > > Edward > > eb...@healthydirections.com > > > > > > > > >
