> Now, did you want that in terms of "number of copies installed" or > "amount of mail handled"? There's probably zillions of little Fedora > and > Ubuntu boxes running whatever MTA came off the disk that are handling 1 > or 2 pieces of mail a day, and then there's whatever backends are used > by MSN/Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL, etc. "This MTA packed by weight, not by > volume. > Some settling of contents may have occurred during shipping and > spamming." > > (Seriously - if 95% of the mail out there is spam, then the top 4-5 > MTAs are probably the ratware that's sending out the spam. Something > to consider...)
In keeping with this concept, and turning it around. What MTA is exposed to the most spam? (1-x) That should tell you what MTA handles the most "good" mail by also being the destination for the most spam (good, live recipients). Or I could be missing something well known about mail flows. Deepak