On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:08:13PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 21 okt 2009, at 21:55, Owen DeLong wrote: > > >However, making it available as an option in DHCPv6 allows the end- > >user/operator > >to choose the technology that fits their needs best. I do not know > >why you are so > >determined to prevent this choice at the operator level. > > For the same reason that we don't let the kids play with the > powertools: giving them what they want here just makes everything end > in tears. > > If people want to run DHCPv6, fine, we're all adults. If they want to > go to the IETF and fix what's wrong with DHCPv6, so much the better. > But taking the information from the place where we can make sure it's > correct and putting it in a place where we can only guess so we break > the network regularly is A VERY BAD IDEA.
so your not a fan of the smart edge and the stupid network. --bill