On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

> On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Jonas Frey wrote:
> 
>> the DE-CIX pricing is now 500 Euro/month...since 1st october...see end
>> of that page.
>> Both DE-CIX and AMS-IX have decreased their pricing this year..almost at
>> the same time. I guess this is a move to stop company leaving public
>> exchanges...i have seen this trend, too.
> 
> That is not why LINX lowers its prices.  (I cannot say why AMS-IX lowers its 
> prices.)
> 
> LINX is a member-based organization.  The member _own_ the exchange.  They 
> are paying themselves, and they only pay themselves as much as it costs to 
> run the exchange.  With more members, more scale, and advances in equipment, 
> unit (i.e. port) costs go down.
> 
> In a cost-recovery model, that means prices drop.
> 
> LINX dropped prices mid-year 2009, and are dropping prices again in January 
> 2009.  AMS-IX dropped prices once in that time.  DE-CIX actually raised its 
> prices for many members, so they could lower their prices for others.  
> Interesting strategy....


Yeah I have had researched multiple exchange points across the world in recent 
months and i can say, not only AMS-IX / DE-CIX but pretty much everyone out 
there is lowering the prices, it might be because of few reasons, 

lifted regulations from governments regarding laying new fiber, and 
operations.. economic reasons, operational advantages vs cost... I am sure all 
Exchange management have considered those and started re-pricing their service 
offerings. The other thing people also notices that, you really never are able 
to get to a big network if you are a small one via exchange due to peering 
requirements of these big ISPs, so they rather go and get transit and don't 
worry about maintaining peering sessions with something+ number of peers, but 
simply 2-3 transit providers who have decently been chosen. Also with a good 
homework, you can practically achieve great results that way... still sad to 
see a lot departing from public exchange points.. 

Mehmet



Reply via email to