Precisely - I was saying that in order to add more point to your argument. I wasn't disagreeing with you :)
Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T www.shortestpathfirst.net GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D > -----Original Message----- > From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com > [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:49 PM > To: Stefan Fouant > Cc: jul; NANOG > Subject: Re: D/DoS mitigation hardware/software needed. > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Stefan Fouant > <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:05 AM > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:26 AM, jul <jul_...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > >> > Martin Hannigan wrote on 05/01/10 16:50: > >> > > >> > Outsourced services have higher cost than Arbor but can handled > more. > >> > >> Do they? VerizonBusiness's solution was $3250US/month so ~$90USk > over > >> 2yrs. Arbor, I think, for a TMS + collectors was +100k. > > > > Don't forget to factor in OpEx. This can often tilt the scales in > favor of > > one vs. the other. > > sure, but just capex alone the 'make vzb do this' option wins. (I > think at least, I'm not a math guy though...)
