Anton Kapela wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jon Lewis <jle...@lewis.org> wrote: > >> I thought there was some other group that had been squatting in 1/8, >> something about radio and peer to peer...but not AnoNet (at least that name >> was totally unfamiliar)...but this was all I could find with a quick google. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnoNet#Scaling > > oh, the irony. good thing privacy costs too much for the majority of > internet users. > > on a serious note, who cares? Resolution to the 1/8 allocation "mess" > seems on par with freeing up IP stacks from excluding 240/4, but by > the time any of this is resolved, perhaps residential users on att > dsl/etc might just have working IP6CP, or will have switched to > comcast by then.
It's way lower than 240/4 one doesn't have to patch the kernel on a billion devices. > -Tk >