On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote: >> Err, no. It was introduced by (unsigned) email purporting to come from >> Eric. Followed by another (unsigned) message with bank info purporting to >> come from Reynold Guerrier. A bit of a difference. > True. Signed would have been smarter. Better still would be having someone > with more creds doing the initial ask.
In my mind, it isn't the credibility of the person doing the asking, rather it's the fact that (unsigned) email can't really be trusted (although most, if not all, of us do it all the time). Regards, -drc
