On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Steven Bellovin wrote: > > I am seriously suggesting that a redirect mechanism -- perhaps > the email equivalent of HTPP's 301/302 -- would be worth considering. > Then, of course, there's problem of upgrading the $\aleph_0$ mail > senders out there to comply...
See the 251 and 551 response codes first specified in RFC 788 section 3.2 and currently specified in RFC 5321 section 3.4. No-one implements them. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.