Why would you migrate them away instead of buying a $150/$250 one-time
license?
tv
----- Original Message -----
From: "Blomberg, Orin P (DOH)" <orin.blomb...@doh.wa.gov>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Best VPN Appliance
Thanks for the information. I am just going on what we have been
formally told by our onsite Cisco engineers on several occasions. It
may be that they were misinformed, or that they are trying to make the
sell for AnyConnect Licensing, but I had been going with the facts I
had. I am glad there is a 64-bit in beta, at least, now I don't have to
migrate all those people off the ASAs right away.
Orin
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:mksm...@adhost.com]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:43 AM
To: Blomberg, Orin P (DOH); sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net; Voll, Toivo;
Chris Campbell; Dawood Iqbal
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Best VPN Appliance
-----Original Message-----
From: Blomberg, Orin P (DOH) [mailto:orin.blomb...@doh.wa.gov]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:37 AM
To: sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net; Voll, Toivo; Chris Campbell; Dawood
Iqbal
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Best VPN Appliance
There is also the fact to consider that Cisco has said there will be
no
support for Windows 64-bit on their IPSEC client, they are pushing
people to the AnyConnect (An SSL-based clientless IPSEC) who want to
use
Windows 64-bit or other OSs, so in the future the argument for having
a
separate box for client-based IPSEC will be moot.
The beta 64-bit VPN client has been released, FYI.
Mike
