> I'm sorry, but some people are spending too much time denying > history. IPv6 has been largely ready for YEARS. Less than five years ago > a lot of engineers were declaring IPv6 dead and telling people that > double and triple NAT was the way of the future. It's only been over the > past two years that a clear majority of the networks seemed to agree > that IPv6 was the way out of the mess. (I know some are still in > denial.)
http://www.hactrn.net/sra/vorlons a decade old, but still rings true randy