Just curious: why not set up a separate entity to apply for IPv6 space? Do you get a cheaper fee (or other brownie points) if you already have an allocation?
John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote (on Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:59:30PM -0500): > Yah, thats what we are thinking here. We'll probably stick with IP4 only. > > Sounds like ARIN has set a trap, so that virtually any contact with them > will result in the ceding of legacy rights. > > We'll be sure to avoid any such contact. > > Thanks everyone for the info. > > John > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joe Greco" <jgr...@ns.sol.net> > To: "Owen DeLong" <o...@delong.com> > Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org> > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 3:31 PM > Subject: Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space > > >It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's > >moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to > >a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space. > > > >We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the annual fee. As it stands, there > >isn't that much reason to do IPv6, and a significant disincentive in the > >form of the fees. > > > >... JG -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM aw...@ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants
