Hello, Tomoya Yoshida wrote:
> I started to advertise for test two /8s and in addition to > collecting of unwanted traffic I checked the status of > route-views of these two /8s including two experimental > prefixes in 27/8 which is allocated to APNIC on Jan 2010 > and old 115/8 space. > > http://www.nttv6.jp/~yoshida/bogon_rviews_20100415_yoshida.pdf > > For 27/8, It seemse that some ISP still dosen't update > their filter or dosen't advertise to route-views by some reasons. > Now I'm using 27/8 space and I found that there is no reachability > about 10% ASes, at least 2,000 ASes as our test, It can't be > said the good situation at all. I will continue to test this month > and would like to share about the result somewhere. > > Also the interesting result is that there is differences between > 14/8 and 223/8 on route-views result. Do you have any idea? I have heard from some carriers that they only accept selected /8s, but not from all IP ranges. Perhaps the test announcements should be 4x /10 for example instead of a single /8. Then the announcements should reach more ASes. Regards, Chris