On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 14:54 -0700, David Conrad wrote: > On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote: > > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of > > the v6 internet > > Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?
DHCPv6 solves that issue if implemented correctly in the CPE firewall/router appliance. William
