I'm a bit surprised that after the furor here on NANOG when the story
first broke (in 2008) that there's been no discussion about the recent
outcome of his trial (convicted, one count of felony network tampering).

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/27/BA4V1D5Q22.D
TL&tsp=1

-JFO




Reply via email to