http://www.google.com/search?q=vpn+service
Encryption would be a side benefit for your purpose. On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Bill Bogstad <bogs...@pobox.com> wrote: > Like many people, I can't justify the expense of "commercial" IP > connectivity for my residence. As a result, I deal with dynamic IP > addresses; dns issues; and limitations on the services that I can host > at my residence. It just struck me that in the same way that > IPv6 connectivity can be done via tunneling over IPv4 (Hurricane > Electric, etc.), that static IPv4 addressability could be offered in a > similar fashion. > > Some my question is: > > Does anyone offer (probably bandwidth restricted) IPv4 over IPv4 > tunneling (with static IPs) commercially? > > I realize that making use of such a service MIGHT violate Terms of > Service agreements, but that is going to vary from provider to > provider and doesn't make offering such a service inherently wrong. > Other possible reasons such services might be desired include wanting > access to Internet services which are regionally restricted. (Again > TOS violation possibilities MAY or MAY NOT apply.) > > In the (very?) long term, IPv4 over IPv6 tunneling could end up being > one way that organizations can get IPv4 connectivity when the default > changes from only-IPv4 to only-IPv6. (Yeah, I know that day may never > come...) > > Thanks, > Bill Bogstad > > -- Brandon Galbraith Voice: 630.492.0464