isn't ipv3....@gmail.com jim fleming? <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg04279.html> (for reference)
pls to not be replying to the list when ipv3.com posts to nanog.. -Chris On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 4:17 PM, William Pitcock <neno...@systeminplace.net> wrote: > On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:50 -0400, Steven King wrote: >> I am very curious to see how this would play with networks that >> wouldn't support such a technology. How would you ensure communication >> between a network that supported 33-Bit addressing and one that doesn't? > > 33-bit is a fucking retarded choice for any addressing scheme as it's > neither byte nor nibble-aligned. Infact, the 33rd bit would ensure that > an IPv4 header had to have 5 byte addresses. > > William > > > >
