and, may i remind you, that the actual point was > On Aug 15, 2010, at 1:20 AM, David Conrad wrote: >> It has been depressing to watch participants in ARIN (in particular) >> suggest all will be well if people would just sign away their rights >> via an LRSA, > Actually, you've got it backwards. The Legacy RSA provides specific > contractual rights which take precedence over present policy or any > policy that might be made which would otherwise limit such rights:
and when i pointed out section nine, you dove for the red herrings. the fact is that the lrsa does require the legacy holder to sign away rights. and if you assert that they have no special/different rights, then why is that clause there? randy
