On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:20:58 -0400, Christopher Morrow <christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Polling a little bit here, there's an active discussion going on > 6...@ietf about whether or not v6 routers should: > o be required to implement ip redirect functions (icmpv6 redirect) > o be sending these by default ... > In ipv4 there's a relatively widely used practice of disabling ip > redirects.
I think it's almost universally disabled (by default) everywhere in IPv4 purely for security (traffic interception.) In a perfectly run network, redirects should never be necessary, so I'd think IPv6 should avoid going down that road again. (support OPTIONAL, never enabled by default.) [It's another insecure mistake IPv6 doesn't need to repeat.] As I recall from long long ago, Cisco IOS would deal with traffic differently depending on redirects... with redirects enabled, a redirect was sent and the packet dropped; with redirects disabled, the router hairpined the packets. I honestly don't know what today's versions do because I've never checked -- A can ping B, I move on. I turn redirects off on *outside* interfaces. Inside (trustable) interfaces vary -- I don't go out of my way to disable them. --Ricky