-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@creative.net.au> wrote:
> Guys/girls/furry-creatures-from-!Earth, > > Complaining on nanog-ml is likely to only achieve personal stress relief. > > This is something you should bring up with your vendor. Say that you'll > move vendors if they don't start making "better" BGP implementations and > adding the features you guys want. Make the list of "better" features > open, public, and actively solicit alternatives. Follow up on your > threat. This is your business bottom line after all. > > Don't just use it as a reason to get lower prices from your current > vendor and then continue complaining when dumb crap like this occurs. > > It would be great if vendor(s) participated in a public interoperability > test suite where researchers could test their stuff against it before > unleashing it on the public internet. I'd love to see something public > -and- cross institutional, -and- include access to things like CRS-level > equipment. > > Go on, I dare you. :) > Maybe the NANOG conference committee (or whatever its called) could get a couple of major router vendor gerbils to come to the next NANOG and talk to this issue? Maybe? Okay, I give up. - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFMeg7Uq1pz9mNUZTMRAtLzAJwNzJMf4YwjP9C42CFANvESJCVoDQCg9trZ lS5Wd5kpH27JBLKkDhibIOg= =fdTs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/