Jon Lewis wrote (on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:44:02PM -0400): > On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Reese wrote: > > >A friend brought this to my attention: > > > >http://ipq.co/ > > > >He saw it at http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1678324 > > > >I'm not sure whether to shriek in joy or in pain. Will data from > >this service - if it is a worthy service - propagate properly? > >Play nicely with or break other people's toys? Is it a gimmick? > > How's it going to break anything? I just created one... > > tentententen.ipq.co. 86400 IN A 10.10.10.10 > > so...now I can use tentententen.ipq.co as a name that resolves to > 10.10.10.10...assuming I trust ipq.co to keep that A record and not delete > or change it at some point. Other than the fact that you can't change > it[1], how is this any different (other than being less useful) or scarier > than DynDNS? > > > 1. EMAIL ADDRESS > optional, but will allow you to update the record later (once we implement > it)
And now FF blocks it as a "reported attack page." -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM aw...@ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants
